Comparing SLIM, SPAR-H and Bayesian Network Methodologies
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comparing SLIM, SPAR-H and Bayesian Network Methodologies
Human factors always affect maintenance performance, and in some cases, it’s critical to systems availability and reliability. Despite such importance, in so many cases, there’s no human reliability method applied to analyze maintenance tasks in order to understand better human factors influence in maintenance performance. There are several human analysis methodologies and regarding human facto...
متن کاملBridging the gap between HRA research and HRA practice: A Bayesian network version of SPAR-H
The shortcomings of Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) have been a topic of discussion for over two decades. Repeated attempts to address these limitations have resulted in over 50 HRA methods, and the HRA research community continues to develop new methods. However, there remains a gap between the methods developed by HRA researchers and those actually used by HRA practitioners. Bayesian Network...
متن کاملComparing Bayesian Network Classifiers
In this paper, we empirically evaluate algorithms for learning four Bayesian network (BN) classifiers: Naïve-Bayes, tree augmented Naïve-Bayes (TANs), BN augmented NaïveBayes (BANs) and general BNs (GBNs), where the GBNs and BANs are learned using two variants of a conditional independence based BN-learning algorithm. Experimental results show the GBNs and BANs learned using the proposing learn...
متن کاملComparing Nonlinear Vector Network Analyzer Methodologies
Scattering parameters (S-parameters) were first mentioned in articles and textbooks in the 1950s and 1960s by Matthews, Collins and Kurokawa and popularized by the release of Hewlett Packard’s first network analyzers in the 1960s. Since then, S-parameters have been used to describe the complex characteristics of a network by quantifying the RF power flowing between its ports. S-parameters are e...
متن کاملComparing Agent-Oriented Methodologies
Numerous methodologies for developing agent-based systems have been proposed in the literature. However, their application is still limited due to their lack of maturity. Evaluating methodologies’ strengths and weaknesses plays an important role in improving them and in developing the “next-generation” of methodologies. This paper presents a comparison of three prominent agent-oriented methodol...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology
سال: 2013
ISSN: 2162-5999,2162-6006
DOI: 10.4236/ojsst.2013.32004